>> communication. >> you just communicated that very well. >> are you then saying that government has no place in college education or pax payers have no place in college education or the taxpayers should then fund careers that the country decides it needs? >> the second one sort of. as this guy is saying there are certain degrees they have slown are going to get you a job and others that have a poor track record of actually getting you a job. they don't want to eliminate those. they are just saying they will incenti vies the fields that are creating the most jobs by giving you a discount on your few -- on your tuition. you can still go and get the other education. i guess i went a step further than they did. but i was just trying to make a poin. it -- a point. >> that proves the point here. >> an unnecessary jab, and he is right. >> look, the reality of it is how many times do we hear we are not producing enough engineers. we are not producing enough of the high-tech skill set. well start finding the incentive that drives students to where they are going to have a future and a career